> > Just wanted to give a short message, that current snapshot does not
> > compile on AIX due to the fmgr changes.
>
> Without more details, that's completely unhelpful.
Yes sorry, I just wanted to know if somebody already knows,
or is working on it, before going into detail.
xlc -I../../../include -I/usr/local/include -qmaxmem=16384 -qhalt=w -qsrcmsg
-qlanglvl=ext
ended -qlonglong -I/usr/local/include -c -o dfmgr.o dfmgr.c
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 26.14: 1506-276 (S) Syntax
error: possible
missing identifier?
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 26.14: 1506-282 (S) The type
of the parame
ters must be specified in a prototype.
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 27.19: 1506-343 (S)
Redeclaration of dlsym
differs from previous declaration on line 36 of
"../../../include/dynloader.h".
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 27.19: 1506-050 (I) Return
type "unsigned
long(*)(struct FunctionCallInfoData*)" in redeclaration is not compatible
with the previou
s return type "void*".
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 28.13: 1506-343 (S)
Redeclaration of dlclo
se differs from previous declaration on line 38 of
"../../../include/dynloader.h".
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 28.13: 1506-050 (I) Return
type "void" in
redeclaration is not compatible with the previous return type "int".
"../../../include/utils/dynamic_loader.h", line 29.25: 1506-215 (E) Too many
arguments spe
cified for macro pg_dlerror.
gmake[4]: *** [dfmgr.o] Error 1
Why do you declare dlopen, dlsym, ... in dynamic_loader.h ?
They are defined in the port specific dynloader.h .
Why do you use "void pg_dlclose" when dlclose is "int dlclose" ?
This makes a wrapper function necessary.
Same with "PGFunction pg_dlsym" when dlsym is "void *dlsym"
What I tried is in the attachment, but I guess at least the cast in dfmgr.c
is unwanted.
Andreas
