Re: Updated backslash consistency patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Date
Msg-id 117A9FC5-AE7F-4540-B732-4483A605251F@hi-media.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Updated backslash consistency patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le 15 janv. 09 à 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> a écrit :

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> This patch has annoyed me twice in two days now, and similarly with
>> other people I know.  Having to type \dfS now is about the worst
>> loss of
>> usability in psql that I can recall.  Can we reconsider or revert
>> this?
>
> I agree, this change mostly sucks, and particularly with respect to
> \df.

Maybe it does so much 'cause you're developing system functions. I've
yet to try it but think it's a good feature.

What about a new \dfU listing only non system objects ( User ones ) ?

--
dim

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: FWD: Re: Updated backslash consistency patch