Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
Date
Msg-id 1168145906.869.24.camel@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 23:38 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > The attached patch warns users when they create documentation output
> > that has no index, and suggests re-running 'gmake'.
>
> This is just useless noise.  If it could tell the difference between an
> up-to-date index and a not-up-to-date one, there might be some value
> to it ... but as-is I think it's just getting in the user's face.
> Everyone using these tools knows about the two-pass behavior.

No, not everyone knows. In fact I would argue that most do not know. It
isn't intuitive to the process. You *expect* that an index will be made.

Joshua D. Drake

--

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] SGML index build fix