Re: buildfarm stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chris Mair
Subject Re: buildfarm stats
Date
Msg-id 1152128083.4457.7.camel@dell.home.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm stats  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: buildfarm stats  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal 
> data somewhere isn't really an option.
> 
> I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in  these 2 tables:
> 
> system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler | 
> compiler_version | architecture >
> build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >
> 
> (stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage 
> that failed otherwise).
> 
> 
> But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?

Nothing important at all.
I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...

But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
mailing list syndrome ;)

Bye,
Chris.






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Frost
Date:
Subject: lastval exposes information that currval does not
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm stats