Re: buildfarm stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: buildfarm stats
Date
Msg-id 44AC15B9.5030204@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: buildfarm stats  (Chris Mair <list@1006.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Chris Mair wrote:

>>but it is about 2Gb of data, so just putting a dump cleaned of personal 
>>data somewhere isn't really an option.
>>
>>I could arrange a dump without the diagnostics, in  these 2 tables:
>>
>>system: < name | operating_system | os_version | compiler | 
>>compiler_version | architecture >
>>build: < name | snapshot | stage | branch | build_flags >
>>
>>(stage in the latter table is OK on success or the name of the stage 
>>that failed otherwise).
>>
>>
>>But what do you want it for? And do you want it one-off or continuously?
>>    
>>
>
>Nothing important at all.
>I'd just thought about a few interesting stats, like failures vs OS
>(as the first poster said) or failures vs gcc version or timings vs.
>arch / RAM or gcc version, etc. For the timings I guess there are
>some timestamps embedded that might be extracted...
>
>But I didn't really think about it, before posting (classic
>mailing list syndrome ;)
>
>
>  
>

We don't have any timing info.

For now this goes on the wishlist.

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chris Mair
Date:
Subject: Re: buildfarm stats
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Scan Keys