Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
Date
Msg-id 11512.1358534778@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Responses Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> 'Extension Template' is fine, I was just objecting to places in the code
> where it just says 'TEMPLATE'.  I imagine we might have some 'XXX
> Template' at some point in the future and then we'd have confusion
> between "is this an *extension* template or an XXX template?".

We already do: see text search templates.  The code tends to call those
TSTEMPLATEs, so I'd suggest ACL_KIND_EXTTEMPLATE or some such.  I agree
with Stephen's objection to use of the bare word "template".
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Event Triggers: adding information
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: missing rename support