Re: problems with configure - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: problems with configure
Date
Msg-id 11500.973790222@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: problems with configure  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> pete.forman@westgeo.com writes:
>> Depending on the version of Solaris and the compiler flags the third
>> argument can be a pointer to socklen_t, void, size_t or int.

> I think what I'm going to do is this:  The argument is question cannot
> possibly be of a different width than int, unless someone is *really* on
> drugs at Sun.  Therefore, if the third argument to accept() is "void *"
> then we just take "int".

Sounds like a plan to me.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Schemas (Re: AW: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1)
Next
From: Don Baccus
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about reliability?