Teodor Sigaev said:
> (foo&bar)|(foo&bar&doh)|(foo&bar&doh&other)
> will be equals to simple query foo&bar, because other variants is a
stronger
That sounds encouraging. My "documents" are actualy quite small. That is
because they are not documents, but just keywords for a user's profile.
(like age28, height187, countryuk, etc) So my documents won't have much
more than 20-25 terms to begin with.
But you do get queries like
'(age25|age26|...|age35)&(height180|...|height200)&countryuk)'
I tested this with a 10000 user database last night on my Athlon 850/384MB
and queries returned actrately in <150ms (and this included a normal where
clause on the base table I need to do as well) So so far I am impressed.
I'll test with a 100K user set later this week, using the "maybe" query
style and let you know my results.
Thanks again,
Bas.
