Re: XA support - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: XA support
Date
Msg-id 1120078331.8208.128.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: XA support  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: XA support  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:27, Dave Cramer wrote:
> I see option A below as the lesser of three evils. Is it reasonable
> to believe that people using XA would
> know enough to allocate enough connections ?
>
> Optionally we could have two implementations and choose between A and B

If they've used it before with jdbc, yes.  It's the way Oracle does it
too.  Under Jboss you have a two to one ration of backend to frontend
connections. I.e. every application connection going through an XA
connector requires TWO backend connections.

IT might be worth putting a note in the jdbc docs though.

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: XA support
Next
From: John Sidney-Woollett
Date:
Subject: UNSUBSCRIBE