Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexandre
Subject Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access
Date
Msg-id 1119601e69129f64a5d083a1af72f4f4@rambler.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom, yes, something like Berkeley DB, but inside PostgreSQL... It may
sounds crazy, but some data just need not all SQL functionality and
overhead, and at the same time I need not second db, so the best
possible solution (in my opinion): two ways of the data access inside
one db.


Regards,
/Alexandre.

On Apr 19, 2005, at 22:37, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alexandre <Xlex0x835@rambler.ru> writes:
>> Lane, thank you, but it is not: PostISAM "generates SQL statements on
>> the fly from traditional ISAM (read, write, start) statements", so it
>> just add overhead, and is not what I'm looking for.
>
> Well, if you don't want any SQL capability at all, I think you are
> looking for something more like Berkeley DB ...
>
>             regards, tom lane
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: multibyte question
Next
From: Alexandre
Date:
Subject: Re: Simplified (a-la [G|N]DBM) DB access