Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
Date
Msg-id 1115.1106181723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1  (Kenneth Marshall <ktm@it.is.rice.edu>)
Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
> If the patch is ready to be committed early in the cycle, I'd say most 
> definitely ... just depends on how late in the cycle its ready ...

My recollection is that it's quite far from being complete.  I had hoped
to spend some time during the 8.1 cycle helping Heikki finish it up,
but if we stick to the 2-month-dev-cycle idea I'm afraid there's no way
it'll be done in time.  I thought that "some time" would probably amount
to a solid man-month or so, and there's no way I can spend half my time
on just one feature for this cycle.

If Heikki wants this in for 8.1, the right thing to do is vote against
the short-dev-cycle idea.  But we need a plausible answer about what to
do about ARC to make that credible...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Caching of frequently used objects
Next
From: "Serguei A. Mokhov"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4918 (23 messages)