Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date
Msg-id 11141.1063378172@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> He is uncomfortable with the port/*.h changes at this point, so it seems
> I am going to have to add Itanium/Opteron tests to most of those files.

Why don't you try to put together a proposed patch of that kind, and
then we can look to see how big and ugly it is compared to the other?
If the alternative is shown to be really messy, that would sway my
opinion, maybe Marc's too.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: __cpu__ defines