Re: The danger of deleting backup_label - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | David Steele |
---|---|
Subject | Re: The danger of deleting backup_label |
Date | |
Msg-id | 11099d88-2d80-0431-24b1-09c5fdc93075@pgmasters.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: The danger of deleting backup_label (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: The danger of deleting backup_label
Re: The danger of deleting backup_label |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/19/23 10:24, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 7:15 PM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: >>> (b) be stored someplace >>> else, >> >> I don't think the additional fields *need* to be stored anywhere at all, >> at least not by us. We can provide them as output from pg_backup_stop() >> and the caller can do as they please. None of those fields are part of >> the restore process. > > Not sure which fields we're talking about here. I agree that if > they're not really needed, we can return them and the user can keep > them or discard them as they wish. But in that case you might also ask > why bother even returning them. I'm specifically talking about START TIME and LABEL. They are currently stored in backup_label but not used for recovery. START TIMELINE is also not used, except as a cross check against START WAL LOCATION. I'd still like to see most or all of these fields exposed through pg_backup_stop(). The user can choose to store them or not, but none of them will be required for recovery. >>> pg_llbackup -d $CONNTR --backup-label=PATH --tablespace-map=PATH >>> --copy-data-directory=SHELLCOMMAND >>> >> I think in most cases where this would be useful the user should just be >> using pg_basebackup. If the backup is trying to use snapshots, then >> backup_label needs to be stored outside the snapshot and we won't be >> able to easily help. > > Right, the idea of the above was that you would specify paths for the > backup label and the tablespace map that were outside of the snapshot > directory in that kind of case. But you couldn't screw up the line > endings or whatever because pg_llbackup would take care of that aspect > of it for you. What I meant here (but said badly) is that in the case of snapshot backups, the backup_label and tablespace_map will likely need to be stored somewhere off the server since they can't be part of the snapshot, perhaps in a key store. In that case the backup software would still need to read the files from wherever we stored then and correctly handle them when storing elsewhere. If you were moving the files to say, S3, a similar thing needs to happen. In general, I think a locally mounted filesystem is very unlikely to be the final destination for these files, and if it is then probably pg_basebackup is your friend. Regards, -David
pgsql-hackers by date: