Re: Scalability with large numbers of tables - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: Scalability with large numbers of tables
Date
Msg-id 1108931462.30529.52.camel@state.g2switchworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Scalability with large numbers of tables  (Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 10:45, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> I'm not an expert.
>
> Turn off tab completion? It's probably scanning through all the possible
> table names and the algorithm used is probably not designed for that
> number. And with 42000 tables, tab completion may not be that helpful.
>
> Don't use ext2/ext3? There are other filesystems on Linux which perform
> decently with thousands of files in a directory. AFAIK ext2 and ext3 don't
> allow you to have single large files anyway - also not sure if postgresql
> BLOBs will hit those filesystem limits or postgresql splits BLOBs or hits
> its own limits first - I'd just store multi-GB stuff out of the DB.

Actually, while ext2/3 used to be pretty pokey with a large number of
files, the latest version seems quite comfortable handling tens of
thousands with a fairly good response time.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Phil Endecott
Date:
Subject: Re: Triggers, again.. ;-)
Next
From: Jonel Rienton
Date:
Subject: Re: PGSQL 8.0.1 Win 2K Installation Problem