Glen Parker <glenebob@nwlink.com> writes:
> For some reason I got into my head the notion that a sequence could be
> dropped even if reference by a field default. This seems pretty silly now.
It was true once upon a time, but we have an enforcement mechanism now
to catch that. Did you find the default you needed to get rid of?
That 2604 row should be it.
regards, tom lane
