Re: merging advocacy and "overview" - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Date
Msg-id 1102085630.2560.298.camel@camel
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: merging advocacy and "overview"  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
List pgsql-www
On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 19:39, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
>
> > OK, but what about dotgeek? They provide a valuable service to the
> > community by giving free webhosting with postgresql. Are they a
> > community sponsor too ?
>
> as long as they are a strong community sponsor ... but, ummm ... right on
> their front page ... "The new server will *not support PostgreSQL* so
> please migrate your DB to MySQL (using the mygeek area of the site) or
> SQLite. "
>
> seems they are a bit mysql-centric, no?
>

Hmm... guess they couldn't get enough traction to stick with postgresql.
Maybe things would have been different if we had properly recognized
them as a corporate sponsor...

By the way, nice how you glossed over the OSTG in your response. Guess
theres no point in mentioning companies like minq.se, kazak, and
aliacta, companies who all provide free tools to the community as a way
to drive traffic to their websites.


Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL


pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"