Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> On Saturday 26 April 2008 13:26, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh, you failed to state that the dtrace output was post-patch. You need
>> to show *pre* patch dtrace output if you want us to think it relevant.
> Please read up-thread.
Sorry, I'd forgotten your previous post.
I poked around for calls to TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId that
are in current code and weren't in 8.1. I found these:
src/backend/commands/analyze.c: 965: if
(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(targtuple.t_data)))
src/backend/commands/analyze.c: 984: if
(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(targtuple.t_data)))
src/backend/commands/cluster.c: 803: if (!TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(
src/backend/commands/cluster.c: 816: if (!TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(
src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c: 374: if (TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(xid))
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 108: Assert(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tup)));
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 123: Assert(TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmax(tup)));
src/backend/utils/time/combocid.c: 156: TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId(HeapTupleHeaderGetXmin(tup)))
The ANALYZE and CLUSTER calls are not likely to be your issue, but the
one in HeapTupleHeaderAdjustCmax could get called a lot, and the one
in TransactionIdIsInProgress definitely will get called a lot.
Neither of those calls existed in 8.2.
So I think that explains why TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId has
become more performance-critical in 8.3 than it was before. Will
apply the back-patch.
regards, tom lane