Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
Date
Msg-id 10986.1033922774@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
Responses Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large  (Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes:
> I personally would at least like to see an aio implementation and would
> be willing to even help benchmark it to benchmark/validate any returns
> in performance.  Surely if testing reflected a performance boost it
> would be considered for baseline inclusion?

It'd be considered, but whether it'd be accepted would have to depend
on the size of the performance boost, its portability (how many
platforms/scenarios do you actually get a boost for), and the extent of
bloat/uglification of the code.

I can't personally get excited about something that only helps if your
server is starved for RAM --- who runs servers that aren't fat on RAM
anymore?  But give it a shot if you like.  Perhaps your analysis is
pessimistic.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Copeland
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposed LogWriter Scheme, WAS: Potential Large
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: New lock types