Cursor and statement names include the value of m_preparedCount:
m_statementName = "JDBC_STATEMENT_" + m_preparedCount++;
and
m_cursorName = "JDBC_CURS_" + m_preparedCount++;
m_preparedCount is static, and it looks like m_preparedCount++ should
be synchronized:
// m_preparedCount is used for naming of auto-cursors and must
// be synchronized so that multiple threads using the same
// connection don't stomp over each others cursors.
private static int m_preparedCount = 1;
private synchronized static int next_preparedCount()
{
return m_preparedCount++;
}
But next_preparedCount() is not used.
Should the creation of statement and cursor names use next_preparedCount()
instead of using m_preparedCount directly?
Jack Orenstein
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
