Mario Splivalo <mario.splivalo@mobart.hr> writes:
> Wo-ha, makes perfect sense. So, I'd go by with declaring the rec as
> varchar, instead as of a record. Wich is what I should do in the first
> place.
Or just return the correct field out of it.
RETURN NEXT returnValue.fieldname;
I think you may have to do it this way because the FOR loop wants a
record variable.
regards, tom lane