Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Date
Msg-id 10892.1371225544@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> I have a question about the commit though: shouldn't both functions be
> static if they are in a .h file? Otherwise, it could lead to naming
> conflicts. I suppose it's wrong to include the implementation file
> twice, but it still might be confusing if someone tries. Two ideas that
> come to mind are:
>   * make both static and then have a trivial wrapper in checksum.c
>   * export one or both functions, but use #ifndef CHECKSUM_IMPL_H to
> prevent redefinition

Ah, you are right, I forgot the #ifndef CHECKSUM_IMPL_H dance.  Will fix
in a bit.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: refresh materialized view concurrently