Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Robert Norris
Subject Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure
Date
Msg-id 1079416353.2123.9.camel@ws12.commsecure.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure
List pgsql-general
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 16:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Robert Norris <srn@commsecure.com.au> writes:
> > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 23:27, satish satish wrote:
> >> I am trying to do some reliability tests on postgre SQL. I have
> >> use-case where the power can go off abruptly. I initiated 10,000
> >> insert operations and pulled out the cable in the middle. I had
> >> auto-commit option turned on. I observed 2 out of 5 times the tables
> >> were totally corrupted and could not read any data whereas 3 times I
> >> was able to read the data which was inserted.
>
> > We'll need more information - what OS and what version of PostgreSQL at
> > the least.
>
> I doubt this has anything to do with either the OS or the Postgres
> version.  My money is on IDE drives with write cache enabled.
> Use drives that don't lie about write completion, and you'll be in
> good shape.
>
>             regards, tom lane

I was wondering if he'd turned off fsync(), as seems common for some
reason...

    Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Data Corruption in case of abrupt failure