Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Who exactly signed onto this as a good idea? It sure doesn't square
>> with my ideas of an ACID database. Committed means committed, not
>> "maybe if you're lucky committed".
> True but we support fsync. Certainly it would be more useful than
> fsync, and it might allow us to remove fsync.
How so? fsync off is for I-don't-care-about-this-data-at-all cases
(primarily development, though loading already-archived data can
qualify too). I'm not seeing a use-case for "I care about this data,
but only once it's more than N seconds old". It certainly does not
replace "just go as fast as you can", which is what fsync off means.
> No one has to sign TODO items, BTW. They are added and removed as
> requested.
[ shrug... ] So if I request removal of this item, it will go away
again? It hasn't reached the age needed to guarantee commit ;-)
regards, tom lane
