Re: Aggregate function error in 7.4 - Mailing list pgsql-sql
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Aggregate function error in 7.4 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 10762.1075276201@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Aggregate function error in 7.4 (j knight <enabled@myrealbox.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Aggregate function error in 7.4
|
List | pgsql-sql |
j knight <enabled@myrealbox.com> writes: > [ query with GROUP BY on a FULL JOIN USING column ] > psql:pgsql.dump:301: ERROR: column "r.day" must appear in the GROUP BY > clause or be used in an aggregate function Argh. This is the result of a thinko in an optimization added in 7.4. The patch is attached... regards, tom lane *** src/backend/parser/parse_agg.c.orig Sat Nov 29 14:51:51 2003 --- src/backend/parser/parse_agg.c Wed Jan 28 02:25:53 2004 *************** *** 98,104 **** parseCheckAggregates(ParseState *pstate, Query *qry) { List *groupClauses = NIL; ! bool have_non_var_grouping = false; List *lst; bool hasJoinRTEs; Node *clause; --- 98,104 ---- parseCheckAggregates(ParseState *pstate, Query *qry) { List *groupClauses = NIL; ! bool have_non_var_grouping; List *lst; bool hasJoinRTEs; Node *clause; *************** *** 127,135 **** * No aggregates allowed in GROUP BY clauses, either. * * While we are at it, build a listof the acceptable GROUP BY ! * expressions for use by check_ungrouped_columns() (this avoids ! * repeated scans of the targetlist within the recursive routine...). ! * And detect whether any of the expressions aren't simple Vars. */ foreach(lst, qry->groupClause) { --- 127,133 ---- * No aggregates allowed in GROUP BY clauses, either. * * While we are at it, build a listof the acceptable GROUP BY ! * expressions for use by check_ungrouped_columns(). */ foreach(lst, qry->groupClause) { *************** *** 144,151 **** (errcode(ERRCODE_GROUPING_ERROR), errmsg("aggregates not allowedin GROUP BY clause"))); groupClauses = lcons(expr, groupClauses); - if (!IsA(expr, Var)) - have_non_var_grouping = true; } /* --- 142,147 ---- *************** *** 169,174 **** --- 165,185 ---- if (hasJoinRTEs) groupClauses = (List *) flatten_join_alias_vars(qry, (Node *) groupClauses); + + /* + * Detect whether any of the grouping expressions aren't simple Vars; + * if they're all Vars then we don't have to work so hard in the + * recursive scans. (Note we have to flatten aliases before this.) + */ + have_non_var_grouping = false; + foreach(lst, groupClauses) + { + if (!IsA((Node *) lfirst(lst), Var)) + { + have_non_var_grouping = true; + break; + } + } /* * Check the targetlist and HAVING clause for ungrouped variables.