Re: Replication logging - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Replication logging
Date
Msg-id 10734.1295366255@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replication logging  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: Replication logging
List pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Is there *any* usecase for setting them differently though?

I can't believe we're still engaged in painting this bikeshed.  Let's
just control it off log_connections and have done.

BTW, what about log_disconnections --- does a walsender emit a message
according to that?  If not, why not?  If we go through with something
fancy on the connection side, are we going to invent the same extra
complexity for log_disconnections?  And if we do, what happens when
they're set inconsistently?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_filedump moved to pgfoundry
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]