Re: searching array - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: searching array
Date
Msg-id 10723.1129575039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: searching array  (Matthew Peter <survivedsushi@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: searching array
Re: searching array
List pgsql-general
Matthew Peter <survivedsushi@yahoo.com> writes:
> Shouldn't >= also return Carols records since she
> contains records GREATER THAN 10000?

You seem to be reading the construct backwards.

    x >= ALL (array)

is true if x >= every member of the array.  This is clearly false
for x = 10000 and array = {20000, 25000, 25000, 25000} ... in fact,
x isn't >= any of those members.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Douglas McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: Problem using start transaction in nested transactions.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner regression in 8.0.x ?