Re: Condition variable live lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Condition variable live lock
Date
Msg-id 10713.1515182599@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Condition variable live lock  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Condition variable live lock
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> * I think the Asserts in ConditionVariablePrepareToSleep and
>> ConditionVariableSleep ought to be replaced by full-fledged test and
>> elog(ERROR), so that they are enforced even in non-assert builds.
>> I don't have a lot of confidence that corner cases that could violate
>> those usage restrictions would get caught during developer testing.
>> Nor do I see an argument that we can't afford the cycles to check.

> I think those usage restrictions are pretty basic, and I think this
> might be used in some places where performance does matter.  So -1
> from me for this change.

Really?  We're about to do a process sleep, and we can't afford a single
test and branch to make sure we're doing it sanely?

>> * A lot of the comments could be improved, IMHO.

> No opinion without seeing what you propose to change.

OK, will put out a proposal.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: setting estate in ExecInitNode() itself
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Buildfarm Client Bugfix Release 6.1