Re: text and bytea - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: text and bytea
Date
Msg-id 1065.1203966723@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: text and bytea  ("hernan gonzalez" <hgonzalez@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
"hernan gonzalez" <hgonzalez@gmail.com> writes:
> The objetionable ones IMHO are decode()/encode(), which can
> consume/produce a "non-utf8 string" (I mean, not the backend encoding)

Huh?  Those deal with bytea too --- in fact, they've got nothing at
all to do with multibyte character representations.  They're for
handling hex and base64 and suchlike representations of binary data.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum not freeing up unused space on 8.3.0
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: text and bytea