Re: SQL Syntax problem - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Franco Bruno Borghesi
Subject Re: SQL Syntax problem
Date
Msg-id 1064858901.1509.1.camel@taz
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL Syntax problem  (Doris Bernloehr <bedo7@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-sql
This kind of conditions are left or right joins, depending on which side of the equal sign you have the (+).<br /><br
/>Something like this<br /><br /> select        ...<br /> from<br /> auswahlkatalog k,<br /> INNER JOIN
anspruchkorrektura ON (k.awk_id = a.awk_id),<br /> LEFT JOIN beteiligter b ON (b.bet_id = a.bet_idemp),<br /> RIGHT
JOINv_betkorr f ON (a.ask_id = f.ask_id)<br /><br /> should give you the same results.<br /><br /> On Sun, 2003-09-28
at09:43, Doris Bernloehr wrote: <blockquote type="CITE"><pre><font color="#737373"><i>Hello. 

I've got a problem in porting the following select statement from Oracle to
Postgres, because of the characters after "b.bet_id" and "f.ask_id" in the
where clause: (+)
I don't know what these characters mean and how I can transform these into
PostgreSql Syntax.


select        ...
from         auswahlkatalog k, anspruchkorrektur a, beteiligter b, v_betkorr f
where           k.awk_id = a.awk_id and b.bet_id(+) = a.bet_idemp    and a.ask_id = f.ask_id(+);


Hoping for help.
Doris


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
</i></font></pre></blockquote>

pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: does postgresql execute unions in parallel?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Need to overcome UNION / ORDER BY restriction