> >
> >In any case, here is a revised version of the patch. =) Thanks for the
> >pointers.
> >
> I must be missing something, but I don't see any difference with the
> previous version ....
>
There is an attempt to do a:
Double.valueOf(x.toString());
in bindNumbers to ensure that the object's string representation is a
number. This is what you were talking about before right?
About breaking functionality with hex.
I'm not sure about this, maybe we could get other opinions in
(specifically Dave and Barry). I'm not so sure that it should be
allowed. (I am not saying that it is not useful.)
Cheers,
Kim
