Re: BIT vs boolean - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Kim Ho
Subject Re: BIT vs boolean
Date
Msg-id 1056750559.5081.12.camel@cpe000475c4cd62-cm013279901416.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BIT vs boolean  (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:33, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> I think there is a patch posted for this already.
> Kim can confirm if that is so.
>

I don't have one for it, but I could whip one up fairly quickly.

I was going to do it for my patch, but I got sidetracked apparently. I
remember looking at it though. The reason why it doesn't work is:

It is actually
    insert into bittable values (b'1');
instead of
    insert into bittable values (true);

Will look at it either later tonight or tomorrow.

Cheers,

Kim


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Garrick Dasbach
Date:
Subject: Re: executeQuery and busy waiting
Next
From: Kim Ho
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow setObject(x,y,Types.BIT) if y is a Number &