Re: On disable_cost - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alena Rybakina
Subject Re: On disable_cost
Date
Msg-id 104da494-03e7-4b14-9827-6a4b34c05466@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On disable_cost  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 08.10.2024 18:49, Laurenz Albe wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-08 at 18:12 +0300, Alena Rybakina wrote:
However you are right that this display will not appear for all
nodes that only contain a data collection procedure, such as Append,
MergeAppend, Gather, etc. And I agree with you that we should
information about it. I also think it’s worth adding additional
information that this option does not appear in the postgres_fdw
extension.
I cannot quite follow that either...
I meant this [0].
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAApHDvpMyKJpLGWRmR3%2B3g4DxrSf6iRpwTRCXMorU0HvgWbocw%40mail.gmail.com

Th disabled description won't display if the MergeAppend and Append
nodes are used in the query plan. I tried to generalize it, but without
success. I'm not sure that these nodes can be called accumulating data.
But I tried to describe this case in the documentation.
You mean you rediscovered the bug that David's patch fixes?

Sorry, it works fine. I apparently tested the wrong version of the patch. Sorry for noise.

About postgres_fdw extension disabled nodes won't show [1]. I think we
should add information about it too. 

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZRwy8202vxbUPBeZd_Tx5NYVtmpvBnJnOzZS3b81cpkg%40mail.gmail.com
You cannot disable a foreign scan...

Or do you want to see "disabled" if the remote query uses a disabled node?
I think that would be out of scope...

Yes, you are right.
-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marat Bukharov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add min/max aggregate functions to BYTEA
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Better error reporting from extension scripts (Was: Extend ALTER OPERATOR)