Re: [repost] pg_restore doesn't work with custom format? - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [repost] pg_restore doesn't work with custom format? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 10434.1003533592@sss.pgh.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | [repost] pg_restore doesn't work with custom format? (Allan Engelhardt <allane@cybaea.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [repost] pg_restore doesn't work with custom format?
|
List | pgsql-admin |
Allan Engelhardt <allane@cybaea.com> writes: > This looks like a bug, or can somebody explain how I'm supposed to > restore a custom archive dump? It looks to me like pg_restore is a tad confused, or at least confusing, about how it handles selection of database. One thing we ought to figure out is whether a -d switch on the command line overrides the original database name taken from the dump file. I would think that it should: if I say -d then that's where I want the data restored to. But it doesn't work that way at the moment. What seems to actually happen if you specify --create is that it first connects to the -d database for just long enough to issue a CREATE DATABASE command for the same dbname seen in the dump file, then switches to that database. On the other hand, if you *don't* say --create then it does indeed restore into the -d database. This is inconsistent to say the least. I suggest that -d ought always to be the target database if it's specified. If we are given --create, then connect to template1 initially to create the DB, same as "createdb" would do. If -d is not given, then use the dbname in the dump file as the default target. The handling of --clean --create is even more broken: it connects to the -d database, tries to issue the DROP commands there, ending with a DROP DATABASE for the dump file's dbname; then it recreates and connects to that dbname and restores there. This is just plain silly and can never succeed (if you do make -d equal to the target, so that the initial DROPs work, then the DROP DATABASE will fail). My vote would be that pg_restore ought NEVER issue a DROP DATABASE. It's just too damn risky to do that. Let the user do it by hand first, if that's what he really wants. In short, I think the behavior ought to be: 1. Target database is named by -d switch, else default to dbname from dump file. 2. If --create specified, connect to template1 and issue CREATE DATABASE for target. 3. Connect to target database. 4. If --clean specified, issue DROP commands. (Note that --clean --create is not too sensible since DROPs cannot be needed in a new database. Should we ignore --clean if --create was given too?) 5. Issue create and data loading commands. Comments? regards, tom lane > $ createdb foo > CREATE DATABASE > $ psql foo > foo=# create table users (id serial); > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 'users_id_seq' for > SERIAL column 'users.id' > NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/UNIQUE will create implicit index 'users_id_key' > for table 'users' > CREATE > foo=# \q > $ pg_dump --blobs --clean --create --file=/tmp/foo.dump --format=c > --compress=9 foo > $ dropdb foo > DROP DATABASE > $ pg_restore --create -d test /tmp/foo.dump > Archiver(db): Could not execute query. Code = 7. Explanation from > backend: 'ERROR: ProcedureCreate: procedure pltcl_call_handler already > exists with same arguments > '. > $ pg_restore --create --clean -d test /tmp/foo.dump > Archiver(db): Could not execute query. Code = 7. Explanation from > backend: 'ERROR: index "users_id_key" does not exist > '. > What's the magic command that I am looking for?? > Allan
pgsql-admin by date: