Re: Yet one more stupid question - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: Yet one more stupid question
Date
Msg-id 1039034387.11430.923.camel@linda.lfix.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Yet one more stupid question  (Dmitri Touretsky <dmitri@listsoft.ru>)
Responses Re: Yet one more stupid question
List pgsql-novice
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 18:00, Dmitri Touretsky wrote:

> One more question related to performance. I have a VERY BIG table
> (abot 20 million records) which is accessed relatively seldom, like
> once a day (basically, it's archived data which sometimes may be
> needed). How this table affect performance of the database? Is it
> worse to create another database for storing this data, and keep the
> main DB small?

It will make no difference to performance except when it is being used.

--
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                             http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
                 ========================================
     "Behold, happy is the man whom God correcteth.
      Therefore despise thou not the chastening of the
      Almighty."         Job 5:17


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: "Devinder K Rajput"
Date:
Subject: Re: Copy entire file as one field
Next
From: Oliver Elphick
Date:
Subject: Re: problem creating database..