Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Oliver Elphick
Subject Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading
Date
Msg-id 1031830517.18150.3.camel@linda
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump problems in upgrading  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 00:52, Philip Warner wrote:
> At 12:31 PM 9/09/2002 +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >3. A view is being created before one of the tables it refers to.
> >Should not views be created only at the very end?
> 
> This would be trivial (and we already put several items at the end), but I 
> am not sure it would fix the problem since views can also be on other 
> views. I presume the bad ordering happened as a result of a drop/create on 
> a table? Or is there some other cause?

It could be, but I don't know for sure.  This is a development db which
quite often gets reloaded entirely and repopulated.

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight, UK                            
http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
========================================   "Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous      man his thoughts;
andlet him return unto the LORD,      and He will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for      he will abundantly
pardon."         Isaiah 55:7 
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Mascari
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?