Re: Possible enhancement : replace view ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: Possible enhancement : replace view ?
Date
Msg-id 1029275206.4742.106.camel@rh72.home.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Possible enhancement : replace view ?  (Emmanuel Charpentier <charpent@bacbuc.dyndns.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 04:23, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > 
> > I'm trying to propose a scenario where
> > 
> > 1. The SELECT clause defining the view is preserved
> > 
> > 2. DROP of undrlying table/column will _not_ drop the view, but just
> > mark it dirty
> > 
> > 3. Using the view checks for the dirty flag and if it is set tries to
> > recreate the view from its plaintext definition.
> 
> I might be dense, but why not try to recreate it directly after the 
> table/column modification ?

If it is a DROP TABLE/CREATE TABLE sequence you have no idea that you
have to recreate a view.

-----------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: Temporary Views
Next
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: OOP real life example (was Re: Why is MySQL more