Re: [PATCH] New predefined role pg_manage_extensions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] New predefined role pg_manage_extensions
Date
Msg-id 1021859.1741364631@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] New predefined role pg_manage_extensions  (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> writes:
> The reason why I walked back my comment was that cloud providers can
> simply choose which extensions they actually add to the image. If an
> extension is marked as not trusted by the author, then with this role
> they can still choose to add it without having to make changes to the
> control file if they think it's "secure enough".

If they think it's "secure enough", they can mark it trusted in their
images.  Why do we need anything beyond that?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: TOAST versus toast
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: strange valgrind reports about wrapper_handler on 64-bit arm