[HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly
Date
Msg-id 10208.1502465077@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] Patches I'm thinking of pushing shortly  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I have some patches sitting around in my workspace that I think are
non-controversial, and so I was considering just pushing them once
the tree opens for v11 development.  If anyone thinks they need
further review, I'll put them into the September commitfest, but
otherwise we might as well skip the overhead.  These are:

1. check-hash-bucket-size-against-work_mem-2.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/13698.1487283211@sss.pgh.pa.us

That discussion sort of trailed off, but there wasn't really anyone
saying not to commit it, and no new ideas have surfaced.

2. simplify-simple-expresssion-checking.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2257.1498412915@sss.pgh.pa.us

This is the patch to get rid of plpgsql's exec_simple_check_node()
as Robert suggested.  It's never been anything but a maintenance
nuisance.

3. remove-pgbench-option-ordering-constraint.patch from
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20559.1501703105@sss.pgh.pa.us

That one was already informally reviewed by two people, so I don't
think it needs another look.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] scan on inheritance parent with no children in current session