Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
Date
Msg-id 10189.1282590934@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Return of the Solaris vacuum polling problem -- anyone remember this?
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, I have attached a proposed patch to improve this.  I moved the
> pg_clog mention to a new paragraph and linked it to the reason the
> default is relatively low.

The references to "vacuum freeze" are incorrect; autovacuum does NOT
do the equivalent of VACUUM FREEZE.  Please stop playing around with
the perfectly good existing wording.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: extensible enums
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [9.1] pg_stat_get_backend_server_addr