On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 18:08, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> PostgreSQL thinks there are only 10 rows in the table. Therefore it
> will not choose an index scan because for so few rows it is bound to be
> more expensive than a sequential scan.
But then I saw Tom's mail saying that it does use the index. How is
that? Surely these few values would all be brought in in one single
disk read?
--
Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
"The LORD bless thee, and keep thee; The LORD make his face shine upon thee, and be gracious unto thee; The
LORD lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace." Numbers 6:24-26