Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Greg Copeland |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 1014061088.20383.24.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Ready to branch 7.2/7.3 ? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
I guess I jumped the gun in my previous message as I hadn't read this one yet. I completely agree with Marc on this topic. What is the logic for simply not snap-shoting what really is 7.2 and move on with 7.3 while allowing 7.2.x to occur on the branch for migration on a later day? Has this been problematic in the past? Greg On Fri, 2002-02-15 at 22:56, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > We're planning on ... this is a 'sore point' that I've been arguing for > several releases yet ... I still feel the branch should be made *on > release date* and not several weeks later ... I think this is the first > release where we will do the branch prior to the minor being released, so, > I guess, as time goes on, we'll get closer to what I've wanted for ages :) > > > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Justin Clift wrote: > > > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > > > > > Okay, if the ecpg is the only issue, does everyone feel comfortable with a > > > > > > branch going in this evening? I'll do a v7.2.1 tar-ball up Sunday night > > > > > > based on the branch, with an announce going out on Monday? > > > > > > > > > > I don't think it's time for 7.2.1 quite yet; we should probably wait > > > > > another week or two to see what comes in. I just want to branch now... > > > > > > > > Agreed. Let's get everything we can into 7.2.1. We normally don't push > > > > out a minor this quickly unless we have a major thing to fix, which we > > > > don't. > > > > > > Right, and we never branch until we're ready for the first minor ... so > > > ... > > > > Hang on here. It sounds like we're following previous methodology to > > our (possible) slight detriment here. > > > > At present, we need 7.3 to start, so that people can begin working on > > it. > > > > We also need to have the 7.2 branch, so stuff for the to-be 7.2.x can be > > included there where appropriate. > > > > So, lets get it branched, because that's what needs to be done here and > > now, in this instance. > > > > Then people with a burn to do 7.3 stuff can do so, and things can be > > added to 7.2.x where needed. > > > > :-) > > > > Regards and best wishes, > > > > Justin Clift > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org > > > > -- > > "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those > > who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the > > first group; there was less competition there." > > - Indira Gandhi > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
pgsql-hackers by date: