Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Date
Msg-id 10015.1181745574@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?  ("Josh Tolley" <eggyknap@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Josh Tolley" <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes:
> On a different sideline based on the original note of this thread,
> much as EXPLAIN doesn't include the schema,  \d doesn't include the
> schema to describe INHERIT relationships in 8.2.4. If you have two
> tables called PARENT, in two different schemas, and a child that
> inherits from one of them, \d won't tell you which of the two it
> inherits from.

Yes it does, because that's actually regclass output.  It'll be
schema-qualified if the table is not visible in your search path.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Truncate Permission