Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io
Date
Msg-id 1000595.1738810334@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Show WAL write and fsync stats in pg_stat_io  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> The queries for the normal context are not going to have this problem
> even if we have a pg_stat_reset_shared('io'), but the init context
> gets unstable, unfortunately.  I don't see a way through here in the
> main regression test suite, so how about moving these into
> 027_stream_regress.pl.  It is possible to query the WAL read on the
> standby of this test, and the write part for the init context on the
> primary.  The syncs are not relevant as TAP usually runs with
> fsync=off, so better to remove this part entirely.

Yeah, if we want to assume we can see stats counts left over from
initdb, we have to put this in a TAP test, though I dunno if that is
the most appropriate one.

Now that I've looked at the tests a bit, I'm also distressed
by this test pattern:

SELECT stats_reset AS slru_commit_ts_reset_ts FROM pg_stat_slru WHERE name = 'commit_timestamp' \gset
SELECT pg_stat_reset_slru();
SELECT stats_reset > :'slru_commit_ts_reset_ts'::timestamptz FROM pg_stat_slru WHERE name = 'commit_timestamp';

This assumes that the execution time of pg_stat_reset_slru() is more
than the system clock resolution.  I won't be surprised to see that
fail in the future.  We did discover recently that gettimeofday is
good to the microsecond on most modern platforms [1], but it won't
get any better than that, while our machines keep getting faster.
Just for reference, on my hardly-bleeding-edge-anymore workstation:

regression=# select clock_timestamp(), pg_stat_reset_slru(), clock_timestamp();
        clock_timestamp        | pg_stat_reset_slru |        clock_timestamp
-------------------------------+--------------------+-------------------------------
 2025-02-05 21:47:54.929221-05 |                    | 2025-02-05 21:47:54.929223-05
(1 row)

            regards, tom lane

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/be0339cc-1ae1-4892-9445-8e6d8995a44d%40eisentraut.org



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve documentation regarding custom settings, placeholders, and the administrative functions
Next
From: Corey Huinker
Date:
Subject: Re: Statistics Import and Export