Re: meson: Non-feature feature options - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: meson: Non-feature feature options
Date
Msg-id 0fff0827-c1f5-d29c-2ee3-dc8c871176bf@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: meson: Non-feature feature options  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: meson: Non-feature feature options  (Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02.03.23 11:41, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> I am kind of confused. I added these checks for considering other SSL
> implementations in the future, for this reason I have two nested if
> checks. The top one is for checking if we need to search an SSL
> library and the nested one is for checking if we need to search this
> specific SSL library. What do you think?

I suppose that depends on how you envision integrating other SSL 
libraries into this logic.  It's not that important right now; if the 
structure makes sense to you, that's fine.

Please send an updated patch with the small changes that have been 
mentioned.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Add documentation for coverage reports with meson
Next
From: Önder Kalacı
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is full on the publisher