Re: pgbench - rework variable management - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: pgbench - rework variable management
Date
Msg-id 0f0e853a-71d7-60ad-f6f1-6dd92d1b0fc0@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgbench - rework variable management  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: pgbench - rework variable management  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/27/20 6:25 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> 
>>> Patch v5 is a rebase with some adjustements.
>>
>> This patch is failing on the Windows build:
>> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.85698 
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure if this had been fixed in v3 and this is a new issue or 
>> if it has been failing all along.  Either way, it should be updated.
> 
> I don't do windows, so the mutex stuff for windows is just blind 
> programming.
> 
>> Marked Waiting on Author.
>>
>> BTW -- sorry if I seem to be picking on your patches but these happen 
>> to be the patches with the longest time since any activity.
> 
> Basically, my areas of interest do not match committers' areas of interest.
> 
> v6 is a yet-again blind attempt at fixing the windows mutex. If someone 
> with a windows could tell me if it is ok, and if not what to fix, it 
> would be great.

Regarding Windows testing you may find this thread useful:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMN686ExUKturcWp4POaaVz3gR3hauSGBjOCd0E-Jh1zEXqf_Q%40mail.gmail.com

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Nikita Glukhov
Date:
Subject: Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree