Re: Barman versus pgBackRest - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ron
Subject Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Date
Msg-id 0eb45bab-8ff7-7255-f052-951edd09b804@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Barman versus pgBackRest  (Thomas Poty <thomas.poty@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
Re: Barman versus pgBackRest
List pgsql-general
On 03/09/2018 08:56 AM, David Steele wrote:
[snip]
>> About pgBarman, I like :
>> - be able restore on a remote server from the backup server
> This a good feature, and one that has been requested for pgBackRest. You
> can do this fairly trivially with ssh, however, so it generally hasn't
> been a big deal for people.  Is there a particular reason you need this
> feature?

(Sorry to dredge up this old thread.)

Do you just change the IP address of the "restore target"?

>> - use replication slots for backingup wal on the backup server.
> Another good feature.  We have not added it yet because pgBackRest was
> originally written for very high-volume clusters (100K+ WAL per day) and
> our parallel async feature answers that need much better.  We recommend
> a replicated standby for more update-to-date data.

Every N minutes you copy the WAL files to the backup server?


-- 
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented
Next
From: Thomas Poty
Date:
Subject: Re: Barman versus pgBackRest