Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrei Lepikhov
Subject Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Date
Msg-id 0e4c813a-18eb-41e2-8edb-89b78d43c82d@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
List pgsql-hackers
On 13/2/2025 01:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> I was idly speculating yesterday about letting the Ryu code print
> the division result, so that we get a variable number of digits.
> Realistically, that'd probably result in many cases in more digits
> than anybody wants, so it's not a serious proposal.  I'm cool with
> the fixed-two-digits approach to start with.
Okay, since no one else voted for the meaningful-numbers approach, I 
would say that fixed size is better than nothing. It may cover some of 
my practical cases, but unfortunately, not the most problematic ones.

-- 
regards, Andrei Lepikhov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Add -k/--link option to pg_combinebackup