On 2021/10/04 11:17, bt21tanigaway wrote:
>>> else if (Matches("LOCK", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
>>> - Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
>>> + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
>>> + Matches("LOCK", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW") ||
>>> + Matches("LOCK", "TABLE", "ONLY", MatchAny, "IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
>> I think this code is redundant, so I change following.
>> ---
>> else if (HeadMatches("LOCK") && TailMatches("IN", "ACCESS|ROW"))
>> ---
>> I created the patch, and attached it. Do you think?
> Thank you for update!
> I think that your code is more concise than mine.
> There seems to be no problem.
The patch looks good to me, too. I applied cosmetic changes to it.
Attached is the updated version of the patch. Barring any objection,
I will commit it.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
