On login trigger: take three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Konstantin Knizhnik
Subject On login trigger: take three
Date
Msg-id 0d46d29f-4558-3af9-9c85-7774e14a7709@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: On login trigger: take three  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
RE: On login trigger: take three  ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi hackers,

Recently I have asked once again by one of our customers about login 
trigger in postgres. People are migrating to Postgres from Oracle and  
looking for Postgres analog of this Oracle feature.
This topic is not new:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1570308356720-0.post%40n3.nabble.com#4748bcb0c5fc98cec0a735dbdffb0c68

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/OSAPR01MB507373499CCCEA00EAE79875FE2D0%40OSAPR01MB5073.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com#ed50c248be32be6955c385ca67d6cdc1

end even session connect/disconnect hooks were sometimes committed (but 
then reverted).
As far as I understand most of the concerns were related with disconnect 
hook.
Performing some action on session disconnect is actually much more 
complicated than on login.
But customers are not needed it, unlike actions performed at session start.

I wonder if we are really going to make some steps in this directions?
The discussion above was finished with "We haven't rejected the concept 
altogether, AFAICT"

I have tried to resurrect this patch and implement on-connect trigger on 
top of it.
The syntax is almost the same as proposed by Takayuki:

CREATE EVENT TRIGGER mytrigger
AFTER CONNECTION ON mydatabase
EXECUTE {PROCEDURE | FUNCTION} myproc();

I have replaced CONNECT with CONNECTION because last keyword is already 
recognized by Postgres and
make ON clause mandatory to avoid shift-reduce conflicts.

Actually specifying database name is redundant, because we can define 
on-connect trigger only for self database (just because triggers and 
functions are local to the database).
It may be considered as argument against handling session start using 
trigger. But it seems to be the most natural mechanism for users.

On connect trigger can be dropped almost in the same way as normal (on 
relation) trigger, but with specifying name of the database instead of 
relation name:

DROP TRIGGER mytrigger ON mydatabase;

It is possible to define arbitrary number of on-connect triggers with 
different names.

I attached my prototype implementation of this feature.
I just to be sure first that this feature will be interested to community.
If so, I will continue work in it and prepare new version of the patch 
for the commitfest.

Example

-- 
Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: gkokolatos@pm.me
Date:
Subject: Re: Reloptions for table access methods
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2