Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From Steve Slatcher
Subject Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database
Date
Msg-id 0d1101c1e561$900a0a10$66b7d8c2@harris
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database  ("Tim Finch, FosterFinch Ltd" <tim@fosterfinch.co.uk>)
List pgsql-cygwin
> Anyway, I wonder why one would run pgsql on MS W32 when GNU/Linux or
> BSD are simpler and run faster and more reliably with less hardware.

I am not sure how relevant it is to this forum, but because it has come up a
couple of times....  It is because there *may* be a requirement to run Windows
apps on the same machine.  And because the staff supporting it are more
familiar with Windows (though the requirement for Cygwin is clearly a
negative here).  Why use PostgreSQL?  It is free, a proper multi-user DB,
and (unlike MySQL) implements SQL sufficiently well.

I am not saying all these are totally compelling arguments - but FWIW that is
the background for my question.  My current feeling is that there probably
*are* better solutions than Cygwin/PostrgreSQL.

Steve




pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database
Next
From: Saravanan Bellan
Date:
Subject: Cygwin-Postgres-IpcMemoryCreate